I’m working on an appeal. The case was major- with the defendant sitting on a $950,000 bond (meaning, in Illinois, he has to post $95,000). There was a bond reduction hearing because just about nobody sitting on a $95,000 bond can pay that, and the statute says the amount should be only one to reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at court. Continue reading ““If you won’t show up on the small stuff…” – On playing Gallaga and bond hearings.”
This article in the Kane County Chronicle caught my eye today:
“West Chicago men charged with damaging city property in Batavia.”
I was interested for a couple of reasons. First, “breaking stuff” (or “criminal damage to property” as the law calls it) is a fairly mundane, common crime. If “breaking things” happens fairly often and the police tipped off the Chronicle that stuff was broken, there’s got to be more to the story, right?
I was also intrigued because Batavia has pumped a lot of money into the river lane area downtown (seen above… under construction). From an outsider’s standpoint, it’s turned out pretty well. I know there’s a bit of controversy over the money the city spent on the arch. It’s not my money, though, so I’m fine with it.
In perusing Nicole Weskerna’s article, the it looks like the purported offense did occur in the newly-revamped section of River lane;
The incident occurred shortly after midnight on Friday, Oct. 18, in the 0-99 block of North River Street in Batavia. Police responded to a report of damage to the front door of a private business at 17 N. River St. Police found that a large cement garbage can, which was later determined to be property of the city of Batavia, had been smashed through the front door, states the release.
The garbage can had been rolled down the pedestrian stairs of the city parking deck located at State Street and North River Street prior to being smashed into the window. The damage to the city’s property included the garbage can, as well as the stairwell on the parking deck.
Sadly, I’m not surprised. The upside of the new development is that it’s drawing more people to that section of town. The downside, of course, is that more people means more opportunity to break stuff.
So, some guys throw a garbage can through a door, and you’re asking why I’m annoyed? I’m annoyed because of the charges. The two men each:
…face one count of criminal damage to government property, a Class 3 felony, and one count of criminal damage to property, a Class 4 felony, according to a news release from the police department.
To the uninitiated, a Class 3 felony is more severe and carries a higher maximum (and minimum) prison sentence than a Class 4. Here, the horrendous damage surely done to the city’s concrete garbage can is a Class 3 felony. The damage to the private citizen’s door is a Class 4.
Why is that?
Because the garbage can is owned by the government. If somebody took your garbage can and threw it through your door, they would be charged with two class 4 felonies. If they took the government’s garbage can and threw it through the government’s door, it would be two class 3 felonies- even if the damage was identical.
Why is the law written like that? I have no idea. It makes no sense. Apparently their stuff is more important than your stuff.